hits

Vannmannen

Februar er rett rundt hjrnet, og det samme er 20-rsdagen min, enn det da. Jeg skulle nesten nske, sett bort i fra at jeg var heldig fikk kjre opp tidlig, at jeg ikke ble 20 s tidlig haha. Alle rundt meg som har bursdag sent p ret er s sjalu for at jeg fyller 20, for da kan jeg lizzom kjpe vodka og jeg kan skru p rocke-foten p Downtown og komme inn over alt. Men jeg vil egentlig vre forever teenager. Jeg vil vre 18 r for alltid egentlig. Men, det er ikke noe gjre med den saken, og jeg skjnner at jeg ikke er i posisjon til klage p bursdagsdato snn egentlig, s jeg skal holde munn. 

Jeg kjpte et blad denne mneden, jeg kjper egentlig ikke magasiner osv, men jeg bare flte skikkelig for det. P siste side kom jeg til horoskopet, som jo i grunn er litt artig lese, spesielt fordi jeg ALLTID finner en mte se p livet slik at det passer perfekt til det som str om mitt stjernetegn, flere som kjenner seg igjen der? I hvert fall s passet det seff denne gangen ogs, som alle andre ganger. 


Det var egentlig ikke noe spesielt jeg ville f frem med dette innlegget, noen ganger m man bare blogge om det frste som faller en inn. Hper dere fr en fin dag videre! 

5 kommentarer

det er gy lese horoskop noen ganger, de stemmer ofte ogs :D

Koselig koselig Mathilde holck :-) jg elsker vodka , bli aldri kjedelig 👌 oh my God ;-) jg hre p all eyes on you :-) sov godt 👀

Hei boss lady :-) du spiller kjempe bra ;-) er kjempe glad for det :-) jg hper at du skal bli god i hndball mer og mer :-) st p fine blomster ;)

Har lest bloggen din i flere r, og p hvert eneste innlegg scroller jeg ned for lese den faste kommentaren fra Barry, haha

Jeg pleier alltid strekke ting sykt langt for at ting i horoskopet skal passe, selv om det ikke har noe sammenheng med livet mitt, hahha

I have found another very important mistake yesterday (Jan 17). No, not in that program, but another one...

I have thought about how it is better to allocate resources (time, money, etc.) in my relationships between many

women and I found that for each kind of relationship (with my children and without - i.e. ) YOU MUST CHOOSE ONLY ONE PERSON!

Because that allocation problem is like gambling with a roulette. I MUST play it, betting

my resources on some digits, representing my choice to invest in some kind of relationship with a

particular person with whom I can have it. There are 3 kind of them:

- bilateral, when I and the person, I chose, both spend resources to raise our child;

- unilateral, when only I spend resources for our child;

- a hypothetical "altruism"-like relationship, in which I help to raise other woman's children just because she is so similar and much better version of me;

I usually cannot have a bilateral relationship with many people and even unilateral one is often hard to obtain. Altruism is much easier to obtain, but much harder to cope with, I feel. So. There may be not 37 digits like in a casino roulette, but as much as I have persons willing to establish a given kind of relationship with me. Three roulette for each kind of relationship. Also in that "love" roulette, its digits all have different probabilities to success. Success here implies that the relationship with the concerned person is the best one among the others from that kind of relaionship. The best one according to advantages it will bring in reality (after time passed). In such a model, it is easy to conclude that one must bet on those digits, which have the biggest probability to success. Well, it is just a model, and I might have done other mistakes in my conclusions, but anyway... What do I wanted to say? THINK MANY TIMES BEFORE (NOT-)RUINING RELATIONSHIPS!!!

Follow your instincts, girls ; )

Skriv en ny kommentar